Institutional Readiness Documentation

Goal: Collect everything required to move CepatEdge from a strong technical project to an institution-ready system for risk-averse universities and large organizations.

This folder is not about product features. It is about the institutional trust layer:

• Identity & access integration (SSO, group/role mapping, revocation)
• Security posture, threat model, and logging/audit expectations
• Data governance (retention, residency, classification, subject rights)
• Operational sustainability (backups, DR, monitoring, on-call, ownership)
• Pilot readiness and communication with IT/security/compliance teams

Audience

• Internal: CepatEdge maintainers and contributors planning enterprise hardening.
• External (read-only): University IT, security, and governance reviewers who want to see:
  • What gaps we have already identified
  • How we plan to close them
  • What we will deliver before a pilot

Structure

• pilot-readiness-gap-assessment.md – Summary of how CepatEdge compares to typical university requirements (IT infra, security, data governance, operations) and the concrete gaps we must close.
• hardening-sprint-plan.md – 4–8 week plan focused only on institutional hardening (SSO, tokens, audit, backups/DR, support model), not feature work.

How to Use This Folder

• When talking to an institution:
  • Use the gap assessment to show we understand their concerns.
  • Use the hardening plan to show what we will execute before or during a pilot.
• When planning work:
  • Treat this folder as the source of truth for enterprise requirements.
  • Update these docs whenever we change our security/operations story.

These documents deliberately avoid marketing language. They are written for security-minded, risk-averse reviewers who care about controls, ownership, and survivability more than features.